Truth, Lies, and Other People's Lives
Tuesday, September 1, 2009 at 02:57PM Poets are not journalists or historians or even memoir writers, yet our poems often address other people's lives and public events. What is the poet's obligation to the facts? To truth? To other people? Why use poetry to address something that has already been written about in prose?
These are some of the questions I struggled with while I was writing the poems in The Serial Killer's Daughter. The poems arise from actual and reported events, yet the poems are works of imagination. My intention in writing this book was to create a work of art.
It is the book I never intended - or wanted - to write. A few years ago when I was preparing to teach a class, "The Poet as Witness" I was trying out exercises that I might assign the class. To my surprise, I found myself wrting from the point of view of Velma Barfield's daughter, or more accurately, the daughter as I imagined her. Okay, I thought: one poem, and I'm done. But it soon became clear that was like saying to myself, I'm just going to run a mile or two. So I let the poems come, even as I kept wondering why events 25 years in the past still resonated and demanded my attention. I'm not sure I'll ever have a logical explanation for why I wrote these poems.
The poems in the book are a fraction of what I wrote. As I tell my students, you have to love this work enough to write really horrible poems and to keep showing up at the blank page (or screen) every day.
I also like to quote Richard Hugo, who wrote in his wonderful book of essays on poetry, The Triggering Town: "The words should not serve the subject. The subject should serve the words. This may mean violating the facts...You owe reality nothing and the truth about your feelings everything."
I invite you to join me in Burnsville, NC, next week to explore the questions I posed at the beginning of this entry. Bring your own questions and let's explore the intersection of art and "real life." (Or should that be "reel" life?).

